Eleições são assuntos partidários. A segurança e transparência eleitoral, não. São agendas suprapartidárias.  For this reason, this is one of the rare themes where most ideological opponents converge: the vote needs to be transparent, supervised by the lay voter in technology, widely audited in ways that are independent of the electoral administrator, as well as recounted - if necessary - as in all democracies in the world.
Since 1996, center, right and left parliamentarians, (see the Printed Vote saga), unem-se para garantir o Voto Físico/Impresso e maior transparência nas apurações. Todas as Leis maciçamente aprovadas, mas derrubadas pelo judiciário que reveza-se no serviço eleitoral. O que desmente outra #fake news  e falácia recente: a de que só “Bolsonaristas” ou a direita defendem a mudança. Esquecem que todos eles votam e defendem a mesma bandeira há muitos anos, quando o atual presidente nem sonhava com a candidatura. A direita e bolsonaristas, apenas somam sua voz hoje, a uma demanda inaugurada há mais de uma década!

 Confira mais em Who we are, até o MST já protestou contra a “urna caixa preta”! 

Are you atheist? Religious? It doesn't matter either, because you believe or not in a supreme deity, every two years, you are among the millions of Brazilians forced to perform a ritual of submission and faith, before an abstract entity in the elections, called by respectable computer scientists, as The “Sect of the holy byte”. And this organization, led by strangers from imperfect humanity, who also vote and have political preferences, imposes unrestricted submission to all Brazilians, at their command over the electronic ballot boxes - which cannot be taxed by ordinary citizens.
In Brazil you press a button and vote for “faith”, having to rely blindly on the result that the abstract entity proclaims, far from the scrutiny of mortal subjects. If your candidate gets elected, you're happy. But if he doesn't go and suspect fraud, he becomes a "heretic", a bad loser!

Electorally - the country subject to all kinds of hacking by authorities, including the STJ and TSE itself - has become an isolated island from the rest of the world, where voters and their candidates can not only demand recounts, but recounts alter the winner of the elections - sometimes by a difference of a few votes.
Fortunately today, the majority of the population has awakened and challenges submission to the blind virtual vote. We need to regain confidence in the suffrage process, with rationality, never out of mere "faith" or belief.

Here it will be shown by suitable researchers, that of the 193 countries on the planet - except authoritarian regimes and Brazil - all the others, (especially those that adopted electronic voting), exercise the rights to public scrutiny and physical recount of the vote, denied to Brazilians - despite our electoral service being provided by a Public Agent, subordinate to the Advertising Principle expressed in Art. 37 CF / 1988.
All democracies offer tools to parties, candidates and voters to challenge the electoral service itself, through independent judicial bodies, and for this reason, they are impartial justices. No other democratic country, as far as we know, concentrates the weight of the electoral judiciary and administrative in a single body, still reinforced with members of a supreme court. 

So if you weigh your back of every Brazilian, from the richest to the most humble, an expensive, giddy and obese voting system with conflicting powers, if we vote for “faith” or become “heretics” those who contest the burden, it would not be appropriate to say that we live in an Autocracy Electoral? 
In the country marked by corruption and successive hacking (including invasions by the electoral administrator himself), what is the guarantee of the fairness of the elections? Only the response of the heavy public agent, supported by the public, who says: "The guarantee soy yo!" 

Mais sobre a anomalia democrática e a retórica de que “nunca houve fraude”, em Quem Somos.